|
THE
TALE OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
The claims made by the theory of
evolution are not limited only to these but they also declare that humans
evolved from apes, and that thus apes are humans' ancestors.
Neither Darwin nor any other evolutionists
have any proof to back up their claims. This statement is a totally fantasy.
In reality, the reason for bringing forward a theory such as the theory
of evolution is to make people forget that God created them. If people
believe that they occurred by chance and their ancestor was an animal,
then they feel no responsibility towards God. In turn, this causes them
to forget all their religious values and become selfish. Selfish people
lose such good feelings as love for their people and their families. You
see, evolutionists try to distance people from such loyal feelings, and
this is why they assert the theory of evolution. Their aim is to make
people forget God, and for this reason they tell everyone, "God did not
create you. You have come from apes, that is, you are an advanced animal."
 In
truth, God created humans. Compared to other living beings, the human
being is the only creature that can speak, think, rejoice, and take decisions,
is intelligent, can set up civilisations and can communicate at an advanced
level. God is the One Who has given all these features to the humans.
Neither ape, nor any other creature
for that matter, can talk, think or make decisions in the way we do.
EVOLUTIONISTS
CANNOT SHOW ANY PROOF THAT HUMANS CAME FROM APES
In the field of science, it is very
important to produce "proof". When you make a claim, and if you want others
to believe it, then you have to show some proof. For example, if you introduce
yourself to someone and say, "My name is Omar" and then this person says,
"I do not believe that your name is Omar," then in that case you would
have to have some proof that your name really is Omar. What could your
proof be? An ID card could be a proof, or a birth certificate, or passport,
or maybe your school report card, among other things. If you show one
of these to that person, he will not object.
Now let us give a scientific example.
There was a scientist called Newton who lived in the last century who
claimed that there is something called the "gravity" on earth. He replied
to those who asked him how he knew this, "When an apple falls off a tree,
it falls on the ground. It doesn't stay in the air". That meant that there
is a force pulling the apple to the ground and he called it "gravity".
Therefore, evolutionists have to
show some proof to make their theories believable. For example, the theory
of evolution states that the ancestors of humans are the apes. Then we
should ask them: Where did you get this idea and where is your proof?
If the ancestors of humans are apes,
we should find the fossils of creatures that are half human and half ape
as confirmation. However, such a fossil has not been discovered until
today. We have only found the fossils of humans or apes. This means that
Evolutionists have absolutely no proof that apes are the ancestors of
humans.
However, evolutionists try to trick
people with their theories. How?
SOME
TRICKS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS:
 1.
Evolutionists show the fossils of extinct ape species as if they belong
to creatures that are half human and half ape.
You probably have seen pictures such
as the one above. You see, by drawing such pictures, evolutionists try
to confuse people. In truth, such creatures have never existed. In the
past, there used to be complete humans and complete apes, just like the
ones today. None of the half ape and half human creatures shown in the
above drawing has ever existed. This is far too unlikely to happen. As
we stated earlier, not one fossil has been found to prove it.
However, evolutionists constantly
try new tricks on this topic. For example, while handling a fossil that
belongs to an extinct species of apes, they claim it to be the fossil
of a creature that was between apes and humans. As people are often not
well informed about this topic, they are prone to believe the things that
evolutionists say.
2. Evolutionists show the fossils
of humans belonging to different races as if they are fossils of creatures
that are half apes and half humans.
As you know, there are many different
ethnic groups of people on earth. There are people belonging to different
ethnic groups such as the Africans, Chinese, Red Indians, Turks, Europeans,
Arabs and many others. Obviously, people belonging to different ethnic
groups sometimes have different features. For example, the Chinese have
eyes that are withdrawn to the back; some Africans have very dark skins
and very curly hair. When you see a Red Indian or an Eskimo, you immediately
know that they belong to a different ethnic group. You see, in the past,
there were people of many other ethnic groups and some of their features
were perhaps different from those of people today.
For example, the skulls of people
belonging to the Neanderthal race were bigger than the skulls of people
living today. Their muscles were a lot stronger than ours.
Evolutionists, however, used the
differences between this race and ours as a way to deceive people. They
say, for instance, when they find the fossil of a Neanderthal skull, "This
is the skull of humans' ancestors who have lived tens of thousands of
years ago". Sometimes the skull fossils found were smaller than the average
skull size of humans today. Holding a skull fossil, evolutionists say,
"The owner of this skull was just at the point of changing from an ape
into a human".
|
Just
as it is impossible and nonsense for the change depicted in this drawing
to have taken place, so are evolutionists' claims impossible and nonsense! |
In reality, even today there are
people belonging to different ethnic groups that have smaller than average
skulls. For example, the skull volume of Aborigines (Australian natives)is
quite small, but this does not mean that they are half ape and half human.
They are normal human beings just like you and all other human beings.
Consequently, we can see that the
fossils evolutionists show as proof of humans evolving from apes either
belong to earlier species of apes or human races that are now extinct.
This means that half human and half ape creatures have never existed.
THE
BIGGEST HOAXES OF EVOLUTIONISTS
1. The Piltdown
Man Hoax
 In
1912, the evolutionary scientists found a fossil of a jaw bone and a skull
fragment. The jaw bone looked like that of an ape and the skull fragment
looked like that of a human. According to the evolutionists, this creature
was half human and half ape. These pieces were said to be about 500 thousand
years old, and it was said they were proof that humans evolved from apes.
These bones were displayed as the
proof of evolution for nearly 40 years, in various museums around the
world. However, in 1949, some tests were applied to the bones and a very
surprising result was attained: The jaw bone was not 500 thousand years
old, but merely 2 or 3 years old. The skull bones belonged to the fossil
of an ordinary human and they were only a couple of thousand years old.
The truth was realised later: Somebody
had put an ape's jaw bone onto that of an ancient human skull, and covered
it with some chemicals to make it look old.
When evolutionists could not find
a half-human half-ape fossil, they attempted to manufacture a fake one.
This event was recorded in science
history as the biggest hoax perpetrated by scientists.
2.The Nebraska
Man Hoax
 The
Nebraska Man drawn on the basis of a single tooth. It is extraordinary
how imaginative evolutionists can be. |
In 1922, the fossil of a molar tooth
was found. Evolutionists claimed that this tooth had the features of both
humans and apes. Afterwards, a picture of a creature imagined to exist
between man and the apes was drawn taking this single tooth as basis.
Some evolutionists carried it even further and drew a family for this
imaginary creature.
All these drawings were made taking
a single tooth as a basis… Now think for a moment. If one of your teeth
fell out, and someone who never met you before picks it up and claims
that he can draw an exact picture of you just by looking at that tooth,
would you believe him? Wouldn't it sound just like a hoax, if he claimed
that not only could he draw you but your family as well? Obviously, it
is total nonsense to try to make a drawing of a creature and his family
by only looking at a single tooth.
 In
1927, there was an amazing discovery. All the other skeletal pieces of
the creature to which the tooth belonged were found. The tooth belonged
neither to a human nor to an ape.
It belonged to a pig…
This event was a true disaster for
evolutionists.
Do you see these drawings? Each evolutionist
made different drawings while looking at the same skull. They seem uncertain
as to how they should draw the creature. This is because such creatures
have never existed. These are all fabrications of adult professors! What
would your friends say if you found a bone while walking, made a drawing
like these and said, "Let me show you drawings of creatures that lived
long ago"?
A drawing that appeared in the Sunday times on 5th April 1964
|
 Maurice Wilson's Drawing
|
N. Parker's drawing from the National Geographic in September 1960
|
You would probably never do such
a thing, because you know that it wouldn't be intelligent. However, for
some reason, evolutionary scientists cannot understand how stupid such
a thing is.
THE
PROOFS THAT PEOPLE DID NOT COME FROM APES:
1. Scientists have found fossils
of humans that lived very long ago. These human fossils display no differences
when compared to humans today. Moreover, the era during which these people
lived is an era in which evolutionists claim that humans were still not
formed. They claim that in that age, only the apes existed.
 This
800 thousand-year-old skull belonged to a human being. It proves
that evolutionists are fabricating hoaxes. |
For instance, during the excavations
of a cave in Spain, the fossils of a child who had lived about 800 thousand
years ago were found. The face of this child had the same features as
those of children today. However, if it was as evolutionists claim, there
should have been no humans present 800 thousand years ago. There should
have been half human half-ape creatures 800 thousand years ago. It was
clear, when the fossil in Spain was found, that humans have existed as
humans since they were first created. There have never been any half human
and half ape creatures.
2. Scientists discovered the remains
of a stone hut. When they calculated its age, they concluded that it was
at least 1,5 million years old. This means that the humans who lived 1,5
million years ago were to some degree civilised. They were regular people
just like the people of today. This makes total nonsense of evolutionists'
claims such as that humans evolved from apes, and that first there was
primitive man (half human, half ape) who then evolved into today's mankind.
 3. One of the oldest fossils
found to date is that of the Turkana Boy, which is about 1.6 million years
old. When the fossil was closely examined it was discovered that it belonged
to a human about 12 years old, and that he would have been 1.80 m (5'90")
tall if he had reached adulthood. This fossil alone, with its exact resemblance
to human skeletons of today, was enough to destroy the belief that humans
originated from apes.
4. Humans, among all living things,
are the only creatures that can walk upright on two feet. Animals such
as the horse, the dog and the ape are four-legged, and animals such as
snakes, crocodiles and lizards are reptiles.
It
is impossible for apes that walk bent on four feet to change into
human beings who walk upright on two feet. |
The theory of evolution claims that,
millions of years ago, four-legged apes changed their walking style into
a bent position. The apes continued to walk bent until their walk became
upright. As a result, the human form was established. These claims made
by the theory of evolution are not based on any scientific evidence but
are rather based on total imagination. Studies made by scientists in recent
years have proven that this claim of the evolutionists is totally unscientific
nonsense!
Studies have shown that creatures
best use their energies when they walk on either two feet or four. Creatures
spend twice the energy when they try to walk bent and out of their natural
posture.
Then, why would the apes walk bent,
spending twice the energy, for thousands of years? It would be the same
as if an adult human tried to crawl with a full load on his back. Would
you, while able to walk comfortably on your two feet, suddenly decide
to do a handstand and walk henceforth on your palms? Obviously, no creature
would switch from a relaxed walking style to an uncomfortable walking
style. God has created each creature with the ability to move in the most
comfortable way.
In conclusion, the theory of evolution
cannot answer the question, "Why did four-legged apes decide one day to
walk on only two?"
THE
BIGGEST DIFFERENCE
The biggest difference between an
ape and a human is that humans have souls and apes don't. Humans have
consciousness: they think, speak and convey their thoughts to others in
rational sentences, make decisions, feel, develop tastes, know about art,
paint, compose songs, sing and are full of love and values. All of these
faculties are particular to the human soul. Animals do not have souls.
No one other than a human could have these unique features.
 Wouldn't it be unreasonable to say
that humans originated from octopuses just because the eyes of an
octopus look like that of a human? |
Evolutionists are unable to answer
this question. To resemble a human, an ape would have to go through many
physical changes and would have to have the other faculties peculiar to
human beings. Is there any force in nature that can give such abilities
as painting, thinking, or composing to any ape? Of course not!
God created only humans with such
abilities and He has not given animals any of these faculties. The human
has been a human from the day he was created. The fish were always fish
and the birds were always birds. No creature is the ancestor of another.
God is the Creator of all humans and all other living beings.
The reason that evolutionists claim
that the humans have originated from apes is the physical resemblance
between the two. However, other creatures on earth resemble humans more
closely. For example, the parrots seen in the picture can talk. Octopuses
have eyes just like those of a human. Cats and dogs listen to and follow
orders, just like a person. What would you think if someone said that
humans originated from dogs, parrots, or the octopus? You see, there is
no difference between this idea and the stories evolutionists fabricate.
|
